2.6.2025

Protecting corporate debt in a tight labor market, Labor Law 2025/30

Research from a number of years ago showed that the majority of litigation over non-competition clauses falls in the employee's favor outcome. In early 2024, a draft bill was drafted to amend Art. 7:653 of the Civil Code, one of the aims of which is to reduce the number of (non-necessary) non-competition clauses. Moreover, the labor market has become (even) tighter in the meantime, giving employees a strong(er) position. have. This article examines, based on case law between 2022 and 2025, whether judges, given these political and social developments surrounding the non-competition clause, do judges judge non-competition clause disputes differently than they did a few years ago. Are judges now (even) tougher on employers, or not?

1.1 Labor market tightness

The Central Bureau of Statistics has conducted research on labor market tightness. That research shows that tightness was at its peak in 2022. Employers therefore have an interest in retaining staff and preventing them from transferring to competitors. However, in court proceedings concerning the non-compete clause, the balance of interests will not turn out in favor of the employer if only the interest of staff retention is invoked. Indeed, the Supreme Court confirmed in 2022 in the Meijndert Trucking judgment that the employer's interest in keeping an employee for a certain period of time does not play a role in the balancing of interests for the non-competition clause, even if the employer needs time to find replacement personnel in a tight labor market.

Continue reading?

Download the entire article as a PDF

Also interesting