Supreme Court: 'Pre-pack not allowed again until statutory regulation' (annotation)

On October 5, 2023, the DVDK seminar took place again at EYE. With on the agenda: the consequences for your company of the ESG Directive, which comes into force on January 1, 2024, dealing with transgressive behavior in the workplace, recent and future developments of the non-competition clause, practical tips and tricks in reorganizations and current Supreme Court rulings.

After a career in science and politics, Ilse Zaal (b. 1982) will choose the legal profession as of Oct. 1.

On April 20, 2023, the DVDK seminar took place again at EYE. With on the agenda: the new Whistleblowers Protection Act, the range of parental leave after all the recent changes, the difference between suspending and stopping salary payment in case of illness, the Equal Opportunities in Recruitment and Selection Oversight Bill and, of course, the consequences of the Supreme Court ruling in the Deliveroo case.

In this series in the Journal of Insolvency Law, this time we focus on the position of employees in the distribution of the assets of the bankrupt employer.

This contribution discusses the judgment of the European Court of Justice of 28 April 2022 in the Heiploeg/FNV case. This judgment answers preliminary questions of the Supreme Court on the quietly prepared bankruptcy restart (the so-called pre-pack).

That the COVID-19 period was an exceptional period is obvious. The question is: what impact did that period have on the jurisprudence and practice of labor law? 

Note to European Court of Justice April 28, 2022, JAR 2022/127

Tackling transgressive behavior in sports: balancing between effective approach and protection of those involved Annotation to rb. Amsterdam

The Supreme Court's recent TUV ruling deals with the employer's duty of investigation in the event of employee termination. A cursory reading of the ruling may give the impression that the Supreme Court is adding nuance to its established case law on the subject. But is this really the case?

Time for conclusions, TvI 2022/1 (Forum, editorial)

The Supreme Court's decision of Nov. 22, 2019 (Hyatt-II2) dealt with the question of whether Aruba's State regulation precludes an employee's contractual obligation to undergo alcohol and drug testing.