Publication

Novelle WCO I: a wrong step in the right direction

The position of the employee and the works council under the WHOA, contribution in Insolad Yearbook 2021, Homologation Private Agreement Act, Chapter 9, pp. 203-218

Some thoughts on protecting the volunteer (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2021:2730 and ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2019:5206)

On July 17, 2020, Supreme Court pointed out the Nayak decision, which ruled - in brief - that in the case of a damaging termination of the employment contract by the employer, the right to and the amount of the transition compensation must be determined based on the situation that regular notice had been given, regardless of the employer's intention.

This summer, SZW Minister Koolmees presented the evaluation of the Work and Security Act (WWZ) to the House of Representatives.

The cumulation ground: combining is not so easy, annotation to North Holland District Court Feb. 17, 2020, AR Updates May 20, 2020

An employer can terminate an employment contract based on an employee's culpable acts or omissions.

In its 2017 ruling Zzp'er/FOH1 , the Supreme Court interpreted the scope of application of the so-called obstacle prohibition of Section 9a WAADI2 to mean that not only the employee who starts working for the former hirer on the basis of an employment contract can successfully invoke this obstacle prohibition, but also the employee who starts working for the hirer on the basis of an assignment contract.

Four articles on "Limitation and Expiration Periods in Employment Contract Law" were published in this journal from 2000 to 2005.